This letter is intended to be addressed to a FBI victim specialist. Because as the victim of a violent crime of no precedence (in terms of the weapon the Culprit used to commit the crime), both the time and legal knowledge are not on my side. It is impractical to wait for my knowledge to grow into maturity to take action.
I am Hong Gan. I am the victim of a violent crime committed by a known Culprit – The United States of America President Donald Trump. I have already reported the crime and raised issue to the Congress (see attached handwriting letter I sent to the Congress). The crime was committed at the Squaw Valley, Lake Tahoe area during my vacation trip around Reno/Lake Tahoe starting Aug 20 this year.
What made this crime unprecedented? The Culprit is not present at the Crime Scene; and the weapon the Culprit used to fracture my ferma bone is not a familiar weapon in the general public’s mind. The weapon is not disclosed and accessible to the general public. It is only accessible to the law enforcement officer – the President (or White House). Donald Trump abused the power People entrust in him the same way as a police officer commit brutality toward black people in the history of this (our) country. If it were to be a crime everyday people knows as , and according to the criminal justice procedure, the Culprit should be arrested, restrained and at least not being allowed to continue to carry and use the weapon until no evidence can show that the Culprit did/will continue to commit the crime, threatening the life of the victim.
But the Culprit did not stop his criminal activity after I left the Squaw Valley. He is continuing to commit crime and believing in no one can do anything about this. He is controlling the recovery of this injured right leg after the surgery. Only one day after the surgery at the Tahoe Forest Hospital, a sudden intense shaking/trembling with obvious extreme pain was felt from within the right leg that might not be noticeable to an outside observer if there were one. Another shaking with less obvious pain occurred at a public shelter around Sep 17 prior to the time he might believe that I would go to see the orthopedist again to do an X-ray after the surgery. At other occasions, he manipulated the right leg the way he manipulated a healthy leg which he did at the start of my vacation trip that severely crippled the leg and the ability to walk normally even though I did not use a walker before he fractured my ferma bone. The Culprit did all these including the Crime at the Squaw Valley with no feeling of any guiltiness.
In addition, he replayed skin damaging game as I described in the letter to the Congress with the malicious intention of obstructing further writing and the move toward the goal of prohibiting the use of such Technology/weapon on civilian.
After entering this century, Technology has dramatically changed the way we communicate and the way we have our privacy that we might enjoy in the old times. But the advancement in Technology also exposes human behavior to the Awaring Public Eye, and makes our behavior more transparent to the public scrutiny. Although the Culprit is not present at the Crime Scene, but his crime is Seen or Witnessed (just as this letter is addressed to a private person, but in actuality, it is known to the Awaring Public Eye). His crime is the Unproved Proof. The proof is the Awaring Public Eye. Therefore he is NOT the Suspect; he is the CULPRIT. Why we know what was/is happening, why we know the Culprit is continuing to threaten people’s life and with a significant probability that the Culprit might continue to commit additional crimes and do harm physically to the victim even taking away her life, but we can do nothing about it
We are Human Beings with our special faculty of thinking, our ability to adapt ourselves to any (emerging) situation, and our ability to solve problems. We are not Robotics that is being programmed by any computer algorithms with certain inputs, there comes inflexible and predetermined outputs or results. It should be the Coded Law subject to us, not we subject to the Coded Text. Because we, as Human Beings, have value systems; we have beliefs (many other people also have faith too). We have the ability to make judgments about – what is righteousness, what is goodness instead of evil. We have the common sense of what behavior constituted a criminal behavior without referring to the strict definition of Crime in the Code. We have the ability not to just interpret Justice; we have the ability to Make Justice.
Should the victim of such crime be protected under Constitution the way the defender is being protected under Constitution and Bill of Rights? The defendant has the constitutional rights to be represented by an attorney in the criminal proceeding. The defendant is presumed innocent until proved guilty in this (our) country to prevent misjudgments by either mistakes or fraud, particularly if the crime is a capital crime. The defendant has the right to a speedy trial and is protected to not to be mistreated when their freedom is restrained after arrest.
Should the same principle also apply to the victim of this type of crime (physical damage and death threat)? Is it just the same thing on the different side of the coin? Victim should be protected under Constitution if the victim Is the Victim, and the Culprit did in fact commit the crime. They should have the right to be represented by the attorney. If, with or beyond Reasonable Doubts, the Culprit (or the suspect in general) showed evidence to continue to commit crimes (physical damage and death threats) with significant probability, should the victim be protected until the culprit/suspect could not do further harm and until the culprit/suspect either proved guilty or not guilty. Is it unconstitutional in itself to continue to expose the victim to the Culprit without the protection under Constitution? and the general principle of our constitutional rights to ‘life, liberty, and happiness’ is being threatened? During the past month after I came back to the Los Angeles area, I has been receiving death threats from Donald Trump in the form of nose bleeding, the way the period blood is being shown on the pad, and the blood from skin scratch on my white shirt.
Although the victim can hire an attorney to represent them in the court. It seems that the victim has to rely on a public prosecutor for their case to be able to proceed. The police system in this (our) country is not a centralized law enforcement agent. There seems no such thing as ‘Federal Police’. FBI is the most relevant agent that I can report my case who has the investigation facility for federal crimes.
It is Not the concern whether the weapon is disclosed or not disclosed. It is the Concern whether or not - it is a true fact or not that such weapon do Exist and is accessible to the person in power and could be deployed by such person to commit crime. He can not do this alone; he has to operate through some technical personnel. If it is a True Fact. It should be investigable and discoverable.
Although my case on its own is not a class action lawsuit involving a group of people or ethnicity to imply a crisis, but because the Culprit is now the President of the United States of America, according to the Constitution, President is the Head of the State; in many minds of the general public, He is the one who represent this (our) country. But he is such a bad guy that he could not in any way represent our (this) country. It is this concern makes this case a (national) crisis.
Although I am neither a political analyst nor a political practitioner, my comment (see attached letter to the Congress)on his capacity and his wrong way of doing politics may not be so precise andunbiased from the professional point of view. But as an ordinary people, I can confidently conclude that he is such a bad guy with no integrity, no moral sense at all; and He is a malicious racist.
This case can NEVER be traded in any way, because this case is of constitutional implication. Although in practice, we may find it difficult to attain the perfect status of our Ideal, our Causes (such as Government of the People, by the People, and for the People), but we can always strive to shorten the distance toward that end (aim) of the spectrum.
Attached Document – the letter I sent to Congress on Sep 4th this year. The image file below is to the Senate; I also simultaneously sent one to the chair of House of Representative, and a copy to the local representative Judy Chu without the page for the impeachment content.
No comments:
Post a Comment